Meta and Content
Examines the title, meta description, H1–H6 hierarchy and the amount of readable content.
SEO Performans is a CodeStup brand. All rights reserved.
Contact UsLast updated:
Enter your website's address and see its strengths and areas for improvement, with more than 40 checks of technical SEO, page speed and on-page SEO signals.
See your technical SEO, page speed and on-page SEO status in a single report.
Your score and check details are shown here.
Enter your website address to get started.
Priority issues and actionable recommendations
A comprehensive check that evaluates together the technical, content and on-page SEO signals that affect how search engines understand your web page and the user experience.
By showing strengths, warnings and critical issues separately, the analysis provides an actionable starting point for which improvement to make first.
Examines the title, meta description, H1, heading hierarchy and content length.
Checks redirects, noindex directives, robots.txt blocks and sitemap inclusion.
Shows the Google PageSpeed mobile score, LCP, TBT, CLS and real-user Core Web Vitals data.
Evaluates HTTPS, canonical, viewport, compression, security headers and render-blocking scripts.
Detects alt texts, image dimensions, mixed content and broken internal links.
Validates JSON-LD schema syntax, Open Graph and Twitter Card tags.
Most basic SEO checks passed.
By making small technical and content gaps visible before they grow, it lets you prioritize development work based on concrete findings on the page rather than guesses.
Act on missing meta tags, faulty heading structure, canonical problems and mobile compatibility gaps before they limit your search visibility.
Use resources correctly by separating high-impact issues from low-importance tweaks.
Help search engines read the page's topic, structure and key signals more clearly.
Evaluate gaps in mobile compatibility, accessibility and content structure together.
Measure the changes you make with regular checks and notice new problems early.
By making the problems that limit search visibility and user experience visible, plan your improvement work in the right order.
Separate the page's current state into strengths, warnings and issues; create a shared priority list that the technical and content teams can act on.
Identify problems in accessibility, canonical, mobile structure and core technical signals.
Plan areas that affect the results page, such as the title and meta description, more accurately.
Make the page context clearer with heading structure, links and structured data.
Notice performance losses early with a cycle of regular analysis and fixes.
The analysis alone does not guarantee rankings; it provides a measurable starting point so SEO work focuses on the right problems.
Beyond meta tags, it should evaluate the page's crawlability, technical infrastructure, content structure and user experience together.
It should check the HTTP response, canonical, robots directives and indexability signals.
It should evaluate the correctness of the title, meta description, H1 and heading hierarchy.
It should examine alt texts, internal links, broken redirects and resource usage.
It should cover the viewport, render resources and Core Web Vitals measured with Google PageSpeed.
Enter your web page's address; the tool examines access, technical infrastructure and on-page SEO signals and produces an easy-to-read result report.
Type the full address of the public web page you want to check into the analysis field.
HTTPS, redirects and the HTTP response are checked; at the same time the Google PageSpeed measurement starts.
Meta tags, headings, canonical, robots.txt, sitemap, images, broken links and schema are analyzed.
Passed checks, warnings and issues are presented separately by severity.
Alongside the overall score, see which checks passed and which items need action.
The tool examines the address you enter at the page level. To learn the SEO status of a single page, enter that page's address directly; for the site as a whole, analyze the important page types one by one.
Title and description tags, H1 and heading hierarchy, canonical, noindex, image alt texts, internal and external links and structured data are checked specifically for the page you analyze. Two pages on the same site can give different results.
robots.txt, XML sitemap, HTTPS and redirect rules affect the whole site; these files are examined in every analysis from the perspective of the page entered. No installation, download or membership is required; the analysis runs online in your browser.
To get an idea of the whole site, analyze one of each page type: home page, your most important service or category page, a product page and your most visited blog post.
On sites with thousands of pages, all addresses need to be crawled and evaluated together with indexing and performance data. For this, you can review our SEO audit and reporting service, and to compare your site with your competitor using the same checks, you can use the SEO competitor comparison tool.
We use a systematic audit flow that classifies every finding by its impact, from the accessibility check to an actionable report.
We don't just produce a list of errors; we evaluate technical and content findings together and turn them into a prioritized SEO roadmap that teams can act on.
We check that the page opens over HTTPS, its redirects and that it returns a successful HTTP response.
We examine the structure of the title, meta description, H1 and other heading tags.
We evaluate noindex, robots.txt, sitemap, canonical, viewport and schema markup signals.
We measure mobile speed with Google PageSpeed and check images and broken links.
We present the findings clearly as passed checks, warnings and critical issues.
Check together the technical, performance and on-page components that affect how search engines crawl and understand the page and how quickly users reach the content.
Examines the title, meta description, H1–H6 hierarchy and the amount of readable content.
Checks noindex, robots.txt blocks, sitemap inclusion, canonical and redirects.
Shows the Google PageSpeed mobile score and Core Web Vitals (LCP, TBT, CLS) values.
Detects alt texts, image dimensions and broken internal links.
Evaluates JSON-LD correctness, Open Graph tags and HTTPS security headers.
Don't just read the report; organize the findings by impact and implementation priority and build a measurable improvement cycle.
The SEO score gives a quick summary. For lasting improvement, the cause, impact and recommended fix of each finding should be evaluated separately.
Put errors that directly affect visibility, such as access, indexing and canonical, first.
Evaluate high-impact technical and content issues together with their implementation cost.
Put the recommendations into practice by creating clear tasks for the technical and content teams.
After making changes, check the same URL again to confirm the issues have been resolved.
Measure the impact on visibility and user behavior with Search Console and Analytics data.
The score, the three boxes and the finding cards on the result screen each tell you something different. Knowing what to look at first helps you start with the right work.
The score runs from 0 to 100, and the colour of the score ring changes at 50, 70 and 85 points. A higher score means fewer open problems, but it is only a summary of this tool’s own checks. It is not a Google ranking score and does not guarantee rankings.
An Issue is a finding that can directly affect search visibility and lowers the score the most. A Warning is a gap worth improving but not critical. Passed means the check succeeded; just make sure future changes do not break it. In the finding cards, issues come first and show their score impact.
The tool shows the Google PageSpeed mobile performance score and the LCP, TBT and CLS values; it does not provide a separate desktop measurement. These values come from a test load of the page and can vary slightly between runs. If the site has enough traffic, the real-user data shown reflects what visitors experience and can differ from the test result.
Service, product and blog pages use different templates, so each can produce a different result.
Reaching 100 is not the objective. The aim is to clear open issues and warnings so the page can be crawled and understood.
Spending time on a minor warning while missing a critical issue such as noindex makes the effort wasted.
If the same address was analyzed a short time ago, the saved result is shown; after your changes, use the “Re-analyze” button.
After applying your fixes, analyze the same page again to confirm the issues are closed. For technical help implementing the findings, see our technical SEO optimization service; for a site-wide review, see SEO audit and reporting; and to benchmark your results against a competitor, use the SEO competitor comparison tool.
Read the questions about the analysis scope, the SEO score, interpreting results and how often an audit should be done.
A review that checks a web page's technical, performance and on-page SEO signals to identify its strengths and the areas that need improvement.
Yes. You can run all the checks for free by entering a public page address; no membership is required.
It checks HTTPS and redirects, the HTTP response, noindex and robots.txt blocks, XML sitemap, canonical, title, meta description, H1 and heading structure, content length, image alt texts and dimensions, broken internal links, Open Graph and Twitter Card, JSON-LD schema correctness, security headers, compression, render-blocking scripts and mobile page speed with Google PageSpeed.
Yes. It takes the page's mobile performance score and LCP, TBT and CLS measurements with Google PageSpeed Insights; if the site has enough traffic, it also shows real Core Web Vitals data from Chrome users.
Besides the page, robots.txt, sitemap and internal links are also checked; the Google PageSpeed speed measurement loads the page in a real browser, so it can take several tens of seconds.
Security services such as Cloudflare stop automated requests with a verification screen on some sites. In that case no score is given because the page content cannot be accessed; if it is your own site, you can review the protection rule.
Every URL has its own title, description, content, links and technical tags, so results vary from page to page.
No. The score gives a quick summary; it should be evaluated together with warnings, issues, Search Console data and business goals.
No. Search rankings depend on content quality, competition, authority, user experience and many other signals.
It examines the URL you enter at the page level; it also checks site-wide files such as robots.txt and sitemap from the perspective of this page. A full site audit requires comprehensive crawling and reporting.
No. No registration or membership is needed; you can enter a public page address and start the analysis right away.
Yes. A shareable report link is created for completed analyses; you can share this link with your team or developer.
Yes. Any public page can be analyzed. To see two sites side by side with the same checks, you can use the SEO Competitor Comparison tool.
There is no target score that applies to everyone. What matters more than the number is how many issues and warnings remain open. A high-scoring page with no critical issues is a good start, but it is not a ranking guarantee.
There is no fixed schedule. It makes sense to analyze when you publish a new page, when you make technical changes such as a template, plugin, redirect or robots.txt update, and after applying fixes. For a site that does not change, a check once a month, for example, is often enough.
No, a low score alone does not mean your rankings have dropped; the score summarizes this tool’s own checks. However, a critical issue such as a noindex or robots.txt block can keep a page from being indexed, so look at the Issues box first and confirm the real impact with Search Console data.
Turn the technical, content and structured data needs identified in the analysis into lasting improvements with professional work.
Convey your content to search engines with meaningful, verifiable schema markup.
View the serviceSystematically fix crawling, indexing, performance and site architecture problems.
View the serviceStrengthen titles, page structure and content according to user intent.
View the serviceTrack site-wide risks, opportunities and progress with comprehensive reports.
View the serviceLet's prioritize your technical errors, identify your content opportunities and turn the analysis findings into a measurable SEO roadmap.